e投稿演示站-标准版
2024 年 5 月19 日 星期日
中国区域发展格局演变过程与调控
The evolution process and regulation of China's regional development pattern
摘要

2018 年底中国人均GDP达到64520 元(将近10000 美元)。世界各国发展历程和区域发展差距倒“U”字型曲线表明,中国区域发展格局演变将步入从区域间经济发展差距持续扩大转向缩小的拐点区段。本文讨论了1978 年以来拐点发生前40 年间中国区域发展格局演变过程,① 处于发展上游(前8 位最发达的省区)和下游(后8 位欠发达省区)省区人均GDP的差距从1978 年的407 元增加到2018 年的53817 元;② 城市化和经济发展的重心在外向型经济、非公有经济的拉动下,呈顺时针方向发生旋转,中国东南地区成为经济加速集聚的区域;③ 中国区域发展格局形成以京津冀、长三角、珠三角、成渝地区四大核心区域为顶点、相邻区域的连线为边界合围成的菱形结构,其GDP占全国比重稳定在75%左右。2020 年中国区域发展格局应进入演变的拐点,一方面表现为区域经济差距的缩小,另一方面则是从非高质量的区域发展向高质量区域发展的转变。区域高质量发展是在经济效益持续增长过程中,生态效益和社会效益将相向基本同步的增长过程,并呈现出因地域功能不同而分异的区域高质量发展模式。未来30年,按照促进区域均衡(协调)发展和高质量发展的双重目标要求,应把重点城市化地区、相对欠发达地区、重要安全保障区等三类区域以及区域间互动关系等为调控和优化中国区域发展格局的重点,而建立以主体功能区划—战略—规划—制度为统领的空间治理体系,将成为调控和优化区域发展格局的基本保障。

Abstract

China's per capita GDP has reached 64520 yuan (about 10,000 US dollars). The development process of countries around the world and the inverted U-shaped curve of regional development gaps indicate that the evolution of China's regional development pattern will step into an inflection point segment and that the development gap between regions has witnessed a switch from continuing widening to narrowing. In this paper, we discuss the evolution process
of China's regional development pattern over the 40 years since 1978 before the inflection point: (1) The gap in per capita GDP between the upstream areas (the top 9 most developed provinces) and the downstream (the last 8 underdeveloped provinces) increased from 407 yuan in 1978 to 53817 yuan in 2018. (2) Under the pull of export-oriented economy and non-stateowned economy, the mean center of urbanization and economic development rotates in a clockwise direction. Southeast China has become an area with accelerated economic agglomeration. (3) China's regional development pattern has presented a diamond structure with the four core regions of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta and Chengdu- Chongqing as the apex and the connection of adjacent regions as the boundary. The GDP in these regions accounts for about 75% of the national total. In 2020, China's regional development pattern will enter an inflection point of evolution. The form. is characterized by the narrowing of the regional economic gap, which is essentially a transition from non-high-quality regional development to high-quality regional development. The highquality development of the region is a process of growth in which the ecological and social benefits will be basically synchronized in the process of sustained economic growth, and a
regional high- quality development model that is differentiated by geographical functions is presented. In the next 30 years, the regulation and optimization of China's regional development pattern should focus on three types of regions: key urbanization regions, relatively underdeveloped regions, and key areas for security, as well as inter- regional interactions according to the dual objectives of promoting regional balanced (coordinated) development and
high- quality development. Establishing a space governance system with the major function zoning- strategy- planning- system as the mainstay will become the basic guarantee for regulating and optimizing the regional evelopment pattern.

DOI10.11821/dlxb201912002
栏目区域发展格局与空间治理研究
收稿日期2019-11-20
出版日期2019-12-03
关键词区域协调发展, 主体功能区, 格局演变, 空间均衡, 空间治理, 调控, 拐点, 中国
Keywordsregional coordinated development, major function zone, pattern evolution, spatial equilibrium, spatial governance, regulation, inflection point, China
作者樊杰1, 2,王亚飞1, 2,梁博1, 2
所在单位1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京100101;2. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京100049
浏览量194
下载量63
基金项目国家自然科学基金项目(41630644) [Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41630644]
参考文献[ 1 ] Lu Dadao. Regional Development and Its Spatial Structure. Beijing: Science Press, 1995. [陆大道. 区域发展及其空间结构. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995.] [ 2 ] Fu Bojie. Geography: From knowledge, science to decision making support. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(11):1923-1932. [傅伯杰. 地理学: 从知识、科学到决策. 地理学报, 2017, 72(11): 1923-1932.] [ 3 ] Fan Jie. Comprehensiveness of geography and integrated research on regional development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(Suppl.): 33-40. [樊杰. 地理学的综合性与区域发展的集成研究. 地理学报, 2004, 59(增刊): 33-40.] [ 4 ] Lu Dadao. The changing humanistic and economic geography in china. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(5): 641-650. [陆大道. 变化发展中的中国人文与经济地理学. 地理科学, 2017, 37(5): 641-650.] [ 5 ] Fan Jie. The progress and characteristics of Chinese human geography over the past 70 years. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2019, 49(11): 1697-1719. [樊杰. 中国人文地理学70 年创新发展与学术特色. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2019, 49(11): 1697-1719. [ 6 ] Li Xiaojian, Fan Xinsheng, Luo Qing. The development of Chinese economic geography: A review on papers published in Acta Geographica Sinica from 1934 to 2013. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8): 1093-1108. [李小建, 樊新生, 罗庆. 从《地理学报》看80 年的中国经济地理学发展. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1093-1108.] [ 7 ] Fan Jie, Zhou Kan, Sun Wei, et al. Scientific values and research innovations of human- economic geography in construction of ecological civilization. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(2): 147-160. [樊杰, 周侃, 孙威, 等. 人文—经济地理学在生态文明建设中的学科价值与学术创新. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(2): 147-160.] [ 8 ] Lu Dadao, Fan Jie. The rise and effects of regional sustainable development studies in China. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012, 27(3): 290-300, 319. [陆大道, 樊杰. 区域可持续发展研究的兴起与作用. 中国科学院院刊, 2012, 27(3): 290-300, 319.] [ 9 ] Fan Jie, Spatial organization pathway for territorial function-structure: Discussion on implementation of major function strategy in territorial spatial planning. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 2373-2387. [樊杰. 论地域功能—结构的空间组织途径: 对国土空间规划实施主体功能区战略的讨论. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 2373-2387.] [10] Fan Jie. Frontier approach of the sustainable process and pattern of human- environment system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8): 1060-1068. [樊杰. 人地系统可持续过程、格局的前沿探索. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1060-1068.]